Jordan Times
Wednesday, September 8, 2004

Symposium examines IMF-guided Economic Adjustment Programme
By Mahmoud Al Abed



AMMAN — Now that facts and figures are available, economists and experts agreed on Tuesday that the 15-year-old Economic Adjustment Programme, completed last June, can be evaluated objectively rather than on the basis of personal impressions and political prejudice.

At a symposium to assess the outcome of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)-guided programme that was triggered by the 1988-1989 economic crisis, economic expert Tayseer Abdul Jaber said Jordan took the right decision when it sought help from international organisations.

On the positive side, Abdul Jaber indicated that the Kingdom was able to lower its external debt and achieve economic stability in terms of maintaining a stable dinar and boosting the foreign currency reserves besides keeping inflation at a low level.

He also highlighted the strong balance of payments and the adequate interest rate level that suits investments as well as the major strides that were achieved in privatisation, economic openness and liberalisation.

Abdul Jaber underlined the benefits of relying on market forces, giving a wider role for the private sector and of changing the taxation system and valued programmes such as the Socio-Economic Transformation Plan and others for alleviating poverty, enhancing vocational training and organising non-Jordanian labour.

However, he pointed out some negative consequences of the Economic Adjustment Programme, especially the high unemployment and poverty rates at a time when the growth in the workforce is high at five per cent.

The expert noted that economic growth rates were still below six per cent annually and that the indetedness and the budget deficit remain high.

Nayef Al Fayez, deputy speaker of the Lower House, attributed the public controversy over the programme to the fact that it was associated with IMF and World Bank recommendations and dictations.

“Some believe that the programme came in favour of the rich and the corporate sector, but such opinions are not built on solid facts but rather on personal impressions,” the MP told the forum which was organised by the Jordan Development Centre (JDC).

Yet, Fayez spoke about “side effects” that strained and overburdened the public's living expenses.

He admitted that the sufferings caused by the policies and decisions made in line with the programme's guidelines were inevitable, but “what counts is the final outcome and the total cure from the ailment.”

Adel Qudah, president of the Executive Privatisation Commission, presented a paper on Jordan's experience in selling government stake in economic projects describing the divestment as “ a sucess story.”

Director general of the Lands and Survey Department also contributed to the seminar with a paper on the growth of real estate investment in Jordan during the adjustment era.

The expanding role of the private sector in economic activity was the key issue addressed by Haidar Murad, president of the Jordan Federation of Chambers of Commerce, in the paper he discussed at the seminar.

On Wednesday, Finance Minister Mohammad Abu Hammour will look retrospectively at the adjustment programmes, while Jordan Investment Board Director General Reem Badran will discuss investment-related laws.

Participants are also due to tackle the growth at the Amman Stock Exchange, Jordan's accession to the WTO, the free trade agreements, and the Qualifying Industrial Zone's experiment, among other issues.

JDC is a private nonprofit institution that seeks to enhance the awareness and positive participation of the civil society, including women in the discussion and formulation of economic policies and other issues of public concern.


Back to September 8, 2004