Jordan Times
Wednesday, November 8, 2006

Reversal of disengagement with West Bank out of question — Bakhit

AMMAN (JT) — Prime Minister Marouf Bakhit said a “unity formula” between Jordan and the West Bank, like that hammered out in 1950, could not be repeated, adding that Jordan wants an independent Palestinian state and rejects any alternative solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

In a wide-ranging interview with the London-based Arabic daily Al Hayat yesterday, conducted by Nabil Gheishan, the premier said any talk now about Jordan reversing its 1988 decision to disengage administratively and politically with the West Bank “would probably not be in the best interest of the Palestinian cause.”

He said recent calls to revoke the disengagement decision are “confusing, indecipherable and launched at a sensitive and complicated stage when the best thing to do for the brotherly Palestinians is to emphasise their identity and mobilise all efforts towards the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.”

“Anything other than that is outright manipulation of the ultimate goals of Palestinians and is harmful to the interest of both Palestine and Jordan,” he added.

Jordanian prisoners in Israel

The prime minister said the government has not abandoned the issue of Jordanian prisoners in Israel and is doing what it can to ensure their release. Progress is slow, he acknowledged, attributing that to complications inherent in this file. “We have no means to pressure Israel but legal arguments and utilising our ties to achieve that end,” he explained.

“I can claim that I am very knowledgeable regarding the prisoners’ file, due to the fact that I was the ambassador in Tel Aviv. I am not exaggerating when I tell you that I know the prisoners by name and I know their families. I am also aware of the scale of efforts that have been made to solve this issue,” Bakhit told Al Hayat.

Hamas

The premier said in the interview that rapprochement in the relationship with Hamas might come through official channels, i.e. dealing with the group in its capacity as the ruling party in the Palestinian government.

“If there are outstanding issues with the Palestinian government led by Hamas, there are channels and traditions to address these files. Traditionally, Jordan has never dealt with organisations or factions regarding official affairs in particular. We would rather communicate with regimes and governments.”

He said the renewal of Hamas Politburo Chief Khalid Mishaal’s passport was a right he was entitled to, but Jordan does not term this as rapprochement or otherwise because it does not deal with an individual who has no official status in the Palestinian government.

US ties


Bakhit told Al Hayat that the leadership cares about rapport with its people before any other consideration. Ties with the US, he said, are historical and were taken decades ago as a strategic option “when there was more than one choice… in the age of alignments.”

It turned out that Jordan’s choice was sound, he said, and it is now employing its good ties with Washington to serve Arab causes.

Besides, “Jordan’s ties with the US are not confined to the US government. His Majesty the King has been able to convey the voice of Islamic moderation to key US institutions, NGOs and pressure groups with skill and proficiency,” he added.

“We are not an isolated regime. We insist on having open relations with the world on an equal basis.”

The campaign against Jordan

“We are not fond of conspiracy theories,” the premier said, commenting on US media attacks on Jordan. “There have been offences against Jordan, yes, by some paper or some journalist, and in the reports of certain organisations, but we know the motive behind these offences. We know who is behind them and we know that there are related considerations that have nothing to do with the general official approach of US policy towards Jordan.”

“To explain further, the latest offence targeting Jordan was included in a US report as a result of a stand taken by a certain individual. We know the reasons behind it very well and we do not think it represents the stand of the American people,” he added.

Cabinet reshuffle

The prime minister said the imminent Cabinet reshuffle would be “minor,” adding that it would involve the “transfer of ministers, merging of ministries and dismantling of some portfolios.” He said the reshuffle was driven by the need for “new visions to implement new measures.”

“There have been plans related to this government’s programme that were carried out with utmost efficiency by the concerned ministers. There are future project that might require new ministers to implement,” Bakhit said.


Back to November 8, 2006